Walter E. Heller Western, Inc. v. Bloxham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALLIN, J.
Roger W. Bloxham appeals a deficiency judgment in favor of Walter E. Heller Western, Inc., a junior lienor, following Heller’s acquisition of Bloxham’s real property at the senior lienor’s nonjudicial foreclosure sale. Bloxham contends Heller’s deficiency judgment should be barred by Code of Civil Procedure section 580d or limited by section 580a.
Walter E. Heller Western, Inc. (Heller) made a series of loans to Roger W. Bloxham which were consolidated into a promissory note for $288,000 and secured by trust deeds on lots owned by Bloxham. These trust deeds were later…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Bank of Hemet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kinert v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Jimenez v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Investcal Realty Corp. v. Edgar H. Mueller Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Dreyfuss v. Union Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Simon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Beal Bank, SSB v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.