Legal Opinion

Coker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2016No. S213137PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LIU, J.

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580b, when an individual borrows money from a bank to buy a home and the bank forecloses on the home, the bank can collect proceeds from the foreclosure sale but nothing more. The bank may not obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower if the sale proceeds are not enough to repay the loan. At issue here is whether the statute’s antideficiency protection applies not only when a bank initiates a foreclosure sale, but also when a defaulting borrower arranges a short sale. In a short sale, the borrower sells the home to a third party for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Mathews v. BecerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Gerard v. Orange Coast Mem. Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Russell City Energy Co. v. City of Hayward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Westside Estate Agency, Inc. v. RandallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API