Legal Opinion

State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cung La

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1991No. 90CA0105PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Respondent, Cung La, was shot while driving his father's car which was covered by an automobile insurance policy issued by plaintiff, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company. The no-fault provision of the insurance policy restricted coverage to damages “resulting from the use or operation of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle” and, similarly, the uninsured motorist provision restricted coverage to damages “arising out of the operation, maintenance, or use of an uninsured motor vehicle.” Respondent appeals from the summary judgment declaring that the insurance policy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Town of Crested ButteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Azar v. Employers Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Home Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API