Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1992No. 91SC349Published

1DissentChief Justice Rovira

The trial court granted summary judgment for State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (the insurer) on the claims for coverage by Cung La (petitioner) under the no-fault personal injury protection (PIP) provision and the uninsured motorist provision in the insurance contract entered into between the petitioner’s father and the insurer. The court of appeals affirmed. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cung La, 819 P.2d 537 (Colo.App.1991). The majority reverses this judgment, finding that the petitioner “raised a material question as to whether the assailant’s use of the uninsured vehicle contributed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. HigginbothamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Azar v. Employers Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  5. Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API