Legal Opinion
STUDOR, INC. v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 2010No. A09-847PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant Studor, Inc. challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents State of Minnesota, Governor Tim Pawlenty, and Attorney General Lori Swanson in their official capacities (the state). Appellant contends that the district court erred by determining that Minn.Stat. § 326B.43, subd. 6, does not violate the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions, the Due Process Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions, and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. Because we conclude that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Paint & Coatings Association v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McDonald v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- McDonald v. City of Saint PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011