Legal Opinion
Tamara Diaz v. Kubler Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2015No. 14-55235PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONATO, District Judge:
This appeal involves a suit by a debtor against a debt collector, alleging that by sending a collection letter that sought ten percent interest on the debt, the debt collector violated the provision of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(l) and thereby also violated California’s Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1788-1788.33. The district court agreed that the debt collector violated the FDCPA and the Rosénthal Act, and granted summary judgment in the debtor’s favor.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dorothy Allen v. LaSalle BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Elizabeth Cornel v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Tiffany Tabares v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Association Des Eleveurs v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. Watkins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.