Legal Opinion
FTC v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2019No. 19-16122PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 19-16122 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:17-cv-00220-LHK Northern District of California, v. San Jose QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, a ORDER Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.; et al., Intervenors, Before: TASHIMA, M. SMITH, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Appellant Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) moves for a partial stay pending appeal of the district court’s May 21, 2019 permanent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Al Otro Lado v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Ambrosetti v. Oregon Catholic PressDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Bradford v. Asian Health ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Caremark LLC v. Choctaw NationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.