Legal Opinion

Aerotec International, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2016No. 14-15562PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This case reads like an antitrust primer for aftermarket issues, with claims for exclusive dealing, tying, essential facilities, refusal to deal, price bundling, and price squeezing under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and, differential pricing/price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act. „ Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) is one of the world’s two largest manufacturers of auxiliary power units (“APUs”), which power aircraft functions such as electricity and temperature. Aerotec International Inc. (“Aerotec”) is a small, independent company…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Viamedia, Incorporation v. Comcast CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Rafael Sandoval v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Coronavirus Reporter v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API