Legal Opinion

Bernal v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 14, 2000No. CIV. S 98-1854 FCD PANPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAMRELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Tim Bernal applies to this court, ex parte, for issuance of a Temporary Re*372straining Order or alternatively, a Protective Order, prohibiting defendants Southern Pacific Transportation Company and its successor in interest Union Pacific Railroad (hereinafter “SP/UP”) from taking disciplinary action against him for failing to respond to ex parte written inquiries regarding his medical condition. Plaintiff also requests an award of attorney’s fees, asserting that SP/ UP’s opposition to his motion is without substantial justification. SP/UP…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Smith v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  3. Riensch v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  4. Vicary v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Partida v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  3. BNSF Railway Co. v. ButtrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API