Bernal v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAMRELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Tim Bernal applies to this court, ex parte, for issuance of a Temporary Re*372straining Order or alternatively, a Protective Order, prohibiting defendants Southern Pacific Transportation Company and its successor in interest Union Pacific Railroad (hereinafter “SP/UP”) from taking disciplinary action against him for failing to respond to ex parte written inquiries regarding his medical condition. Plaintiff also requests an award of attorney’s fees, asserting that SP/ UP’s opposition to his motion is without substantial justification. SP/UP…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Smith v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
- Riensch v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Vicary v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Partida v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- BNSF Railway Co. v. ButtrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011