Legal Opinion
Riensch v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 16, 1998No. Civ.A. 98-B-952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Kenneth B. Riensch (Riensch), moved for a temporary restraining order or, in the alternative, for a protective order on June 4, 1998. Riensch sought entry of an order preventing defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP), from requiring him to attend “fitness-for-duty” physical examinations on June 8 and June 9, 1998 and from disciplining him for failing to attend the physical examinations. I entered a temporary restraining order and protective order on June 4,1998 pending a further hearing on June 15, 1998. Based on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bernal v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2000
- In Re WilkersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Partida v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Mendez v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025