Legal Opinion
Vicary v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 7, 1996No. 3:96CV7108PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
CARR, District Judge.
This is an FELA and Boiler Inspection Act case in which the plaintiff has filed a motion for injunctive relief seeking to bar defendant Conrail from compelling answers to certain questionnaires and forcing plaintiff to submit to medical examinations and evaluations outside the restrictions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 et seq. (Doc. 8). Conrail opposes the motion. (Doc. 11). .
For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion, which I deem to be a motion for a protective order, shall be granted.
Plaintiff claims to have been injured on January 20, 1996, while operating a locomotive.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Riensch v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Bernal v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2000
- Partida v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Schnelle v. Soo Line RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997