Legal Opinion
Catanese v. Unilever
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 28, 2011No. Civ. 10-5755 (WHW)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss, stay or transfer this matter pursuant to the first-filed rule. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the motion is decided without oral argument. Defendant’s motion to transfer is granted.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this action (the “Catanese action”) on November 4, 2010, as a “nationwide class action against Breyers on behalf of all persons and entities in the United States who purchased Breyers All Natural Original Ice Cream containing alkalized cocoa or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Pacesetter Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. And Med Rel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Richard Baatz v. Columbia Gas TransmissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Metrics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Martin v. Cargill, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Phx. Ins. Co. v. Teva Pharm. Indus. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC v. Wometco Donas Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.