Legal Opinion
MaxLite, Inc. v. ATG Electronics, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 24, 2016No. Civil Action No. 15-1116PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION FOR PUBLICATION
John Michael Vazquez, United States District Judge.
'■ This matter comes before the Court on Defendant ATG Electronics, Incorporated’s (“ATG”) supplemental motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, alternatively, to transfer.1 This case con*376cerns allegations that ATG improperly interfered with the contractual relationship between Plaintiff MaxLite, Incorporated (“Plaintiff’ or “MaxLite”) and three of its employees, when ATG hired the employees and used them to compete with MaxLite. ATG and MaxLite are business competitors. All three employees had agreements…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. ConnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-9959District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- AVRAHAM v. GOLDENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BEATON v. LG CHEM LTDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Byju’s Alpha, Inc. v. Byju Raveendran, Divya Gokulnath, and Anita KishoreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2025
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.