Legal Opinion
United States v. Edwards
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 4, 1936No. 866-YPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The controversy centers around certain provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 as amended in 1935 (7 U.S. C.A. § 601 et seq.) relating to the control by the Secretary of Agriculture of the marketing of products in interstate commerce, with or without marketing agreements. They are too lengthy to^be set out in full. However, the discussion of the problems involved calls for their general outline.
The act declares, in its preamble, an acute emergency to exist. The cause it declares to be the disparity “between the prices of agricultural and other…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- United States v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- F. & A. Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- United States v. EmeryDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.