Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
Back of this controversy is what may readily be conceded to be a radical departure in the realm of American Federal governmental activity,—control of working conditions, hours and wages,—by the Federal Government through the power to control interstate commerce, the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938,” 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
Not that this is alien to our civilization.
The integrated economies of the early settlers of the American continent found it imperative to control economic activity.
So we find that in the earliest American criminal code,—that of Sir Thomas Dale,…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Neher v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- J. F. Quest Foundry Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Fleming v. Lowell Sun Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1940
- Skelly v. DockweilerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.