United States v. Edwards
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The facts which lie at the foundation of the controversy are fully stated in the Opinion filed upon the interlocutory injunction on April 4, 1936, and reported in (D.C.) 14 F.Supp. 384. The matter is up now for final decision. Counsel have stipulated the facts substantially as set forth in the bill of complaint, which was summarized in the prior opinion. In effect, the government seeks to enjoin the defendant from handling oranges in California in violation of the order of January 26, 1936, of the Secretary of Agriculture, establishing prorate districts and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- United States v. EmeryDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
- Hudson-Duncan & Co. v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1937