Legal Opinion

F. & A. Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 4, 1951No. 12406-BHPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

98 F.Supp. 180 (1951)

F. & A. ICE CREAM CO.

v.

ARDEN FARMS CO. et al.

No. 12406-BH.

United States District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

June 4, 1951.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Balthis and Gordon F. Hampton, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Cosgrove, Cramer, Diether & Rindge, T. B. Cosgrove, J. D. Barnum, Jr., Morrow & Morrow, John C. Morrow, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Henry F. Prince, and Julian O. von Kalinowski, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

YANKWICH, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in the foregoing and related cases are the following motions:

1. Motion filed…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
  2. Flank Oil Co. v. Tennessee Gas Transmission CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. People v. Building Maintenance Contractors' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Armour and Company v. United States of America and Orville L. Freeman, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. National Dairy Products Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API