Legal Opinion

Stahl v. POLLMAN

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2006No. 23739PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Joseph Pollman appeals the denial of his motion to vacate a permanent injunction. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Pollman, Daniel Stahl and Melvin Stahl are from rural McCook County and own tracts of property that are close to one another. Daniel Stahl and Melvin Stahl are brothers and Daniel’s wife is a sister to Pollman’s wife. At some point in time, severe acrimony developed between Pollman and the Stahls. The record suggests that one of the causes was the Stahls’ purchase of some land formerly owned by Pollman at a bankruptcy sale.

[¶ 3.] Starting in 1993 and continuing through 1994, Pollman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hendrickson v. Wagners, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Capps v. CappsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. ErringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Clark v. City of DeadwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trumm v. CleaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Agfirst Farmers Coop v. Diamond C DairySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hoffman v. Bob Law, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Agfirst Farmers Cooperative v. Diamond C Dairy, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. McDowell v. SapienzaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API