Legal Opinion

State v. Ouellette

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 2007No. A06-1727PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of refusal to submit to chemical testing, asserting that the district court committed an error of fundamental law by failing to instruct the jury that it must find that he was lawfully arrested and that the implied consent advisory was read to him. Appellant also challenges his conviction of a lane violation, asserting that the evidence does not support the conviction.

FACTS

Appellant Todd Damase Ouellette was stopped for traffic violations and subsequently arrested for driving while impaired (DWI). At the police station, Ouel-lette…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. ArdsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State of Minnesota v. Joel Patrick RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PitzeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State of Minnesota v. Ava Thadette SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API