Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Joel Patrick Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 2017No. A16-788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge

Appellant challenges the district court’s imposition of restitution, arguing that he had the right to be present at the contested restitution hearing and that the district court violated this right by determining that his attorney’s failure to arrange his appearance constituted a waiver. Because the district court erred in finding that appellant waived his right to be present and the state has not proven that the error was harmless, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

On June 25, 2015, appellant Joel Patrick Rodriguez fled from police while driving a motor…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. v. HernandezColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API