Legal Opinion
State v. Ards
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 2012No. A11-1117PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions of second-degree driving while impaired (DWI) and second-degree driving with an alcohol concentration of .08 or more, arguing that the district court violated his right to a fair trial and that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions. We affirm.
FACTS
On December 5, 2010, at approximately 9:00 p.m., St. Paul Police Officer Tonya Tamm responded to a report of a pickup truck following a pedestrian on Flandrau Street in St. Paul. According to the report, the truck driver and the pedestrian were arguing. When Officer Tamm…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodruff v. 2008 MercedesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Quintin Lynn ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015