Legal Opinion

Bingham Ex Rel. Austin v. Lagoon Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1985No. 19909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

We are asked in this case by the plaintiffs-appellants to find an exception to the “exclusive remedy” provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, U.C.A., 1953, title 35, chapter 1, and reverse the trial court’s order dismissing defendant Lagoon Corporation from this personal injury action brought by an employee. In the absence of an exception that would exclude plaintiffs from the scope and coverage of the Workers’ Compensation Act, this Court has repeatedly held that the remedy provided by the act is exclusive. See Morrill v. J & M Construction Co., Utah, 635 P.2d 88 (1981).

I

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McCormick v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc. v. BeukersAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Henrie v. Rocky Mountain Packing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash LaundryUtah Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Hunsaker v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Walker v. U.S. General, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lantz v. National Semiconductor Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Gunderson v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API