Legal Opinion

Lantz v. National Semiconductor Corp.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 26, 1989No. 880048-CAPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

Clifford Lantz appeals the summary judgment dismissing his tort action against his former employer, National Semiconductor Corporation (“National”), and one of its supervisory employees, John Ford. In dismissing, the district court concluded that the Utah Workers’ Compensation statute, Utah Code Ann. §§ 35-1-1 to -107 (1988), provided Lantz’s exclusive remedy against National and precluded any action against Ford. We agree and affirm.

FACTS

“In reviewing a summary judgment, we analyze the facts and inferences in a light most favorable to the losing party.” Copper State Leasing Co.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Bryan v. Utah InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Copper State Leasing Co. v. Blacker Appliance & Furniture Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Adamson v. Okland Construction CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kim Hirase-Doi v. U.S. West Communications, Inc., and Kenneth ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Robles v. Hovensa, L.L.C.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
  4. Mead v. Western Slate, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. Sheppick v. Albertson's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API