United States v. Federal Resources Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURGUIA, Circuit Judge;
This case concerns the district court’s obligations in reviewing a settlement made pursuant to the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75, that authorize the United States to settle with a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for an amount less than that PRP’s proportionate share of the cost to clean up a polluted site if it has a limited ability to pay. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 9622(e)(3)(A), (f)(6)(B). The Coeur d’Alenes Company (“CDA”) entered into such a settlement with the government,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. RessamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Charter International Oil Company, Acushnet Company, Proposed Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ameripride Services Inc. v. Texas Eastern Overseas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Greenlease Holding Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Chevron Oronite Co. LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.