United States v. Ressam
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CLIFTON; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER.
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals the sentence imposed by the district court upon Ahmed Ressam, the so-called “Millennium Bomber,” as substantively unreasonable. We review a challenge of that nature under what the Supreme Court has described as “the familiar abuse-of-discretion standard of review.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 46, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
Ressam was convicted by a jury on nine counts of criminal activity1 in connection with his plot to carry out an…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- People v. SteanhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Joe Lambright v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Reuben Lujan v. Silvia GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.