Legal Opinion

United States v. Ressam

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2012No. 09-30000PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CLIFTON; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER.

OPINION

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals the sentence imposed by the district court upon Ahmed Ressam, the so-called “Millennium Bomber,” as substantively unreasonable. We review a challenge of that nature under what the Supreme Court has described as “the familiar abuse-of-discretion standard of review.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 46, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

Ressam was convicted by a jury on nine counts of criminal activity1 in connection with his plot to carry out an…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. People v. SteanhouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Joe Lambright v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Reuben Lujan v. Silvia GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API