Legal Opinion

Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Greenlease Holding Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1498PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge

I. Introduction

This, action was brought by plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar .Corporation (together with Trinity Industries, Inc., the “Trinity plaintiffs”) seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. and its Pennsylvania state law counterpart, the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act (“HSCA”), 35 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6020.101 et seq. The present dispute arises out of the contamination of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API