Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Greenlease Holding Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Joy Flowers Conti, Chief United States District Judge
I. Introduction
This, action was brought by plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Industries Railcar .Corporation (together with Trinity Industries, Inc., the “Trinity plaintiffs”) seeking contribution under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. and its Pennsylvania state law counterpart, the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act (“HSCA”), 35 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6020.101 et seq. The present dispute arises out of the contamination of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022