Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Manlove

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth District. Mandamus was denied, and plaintiffs appeal. See opinion for facts.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This case was a petition for a mandamus to compel the de*56fendant, Sheriff of Sacramento County, to execute a deed for certain real estate. The facts are these: The female plaintiff, Eachel, before her marriage with the other plaintiff, D. H. Haskell, owned two lots in Sacramento City. In April, 1855, she sold the lots to one Ormsby, who executed to her and her husband a mortgage, to secure the payment of the price. After-wards, the plaintiff being indebted to one Lynch, transferred the note and mortgage as collateral security. Lynch afterwards brought suit on this note and mortgage, on 29th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waller v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pollard v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Webb v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Bangham v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. White v. CostiganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API