Bangham v. Michael
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.
This action grew out of the following facts: As commissioner appointed by the court therefor, R. E. Bangham, plaintiff herein, sold certain real estate as directed by the decree made in a suit brought by M. Michael against one J. Noble Jones, to foreclose a mortgage thereon. At this sale, made June 16, 1915, Michael, mortgagee, became the purchaser of the property. As holder of a junior lien thereon, the American National Bank was made a defendant in the foreclosure suit, and hence was a redemptioner as defined in section 701 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Early…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilcoxson v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Haskell v. ManloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hummel v. Citizens' Building & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Parcells v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Hutton v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Wilde v. M. J. Murphy, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944