Webb v. Watson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Benton District Court. In September, 1860, Field, Benedict & Co., of Chicago, recovered judgment in the Benton District Court, against the plaintiff (Webb) for abou,t $230; and on the 3d day of January, 1863, under an execution issued thereon, certain lands were sold, forty acres to the plaintiff in execution for $238.05, and sixteen and one-half acres to C. H. Conklin for $45, which satisfied the judgment, with interest and all costs.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Benton District Court. In September, 1860, Field, Benedict & Co., of Chicago, recovered judgment in the Benton District Court, against the plaintiff (Webb) for abou,t $230; and on the 3d day of January, 1863, under an execution issued thereon, certain lands were sold, forty acres to the plaintiff in execution for $238.05, and sixteen and one-half acres to C. H. Conklin for $45, which satisfied the judgment, with interest and all costs. The purchasers each obtained certificates, which, on the 9th of February next after, they assigned to the defendant Watson. On the 6th of January,…
1Opinion of the Court
Wright, Ch. J.
1. Redemption: time, place, medium. The land in controversy was worth, at the time of the alleged redemption, about two thousand dollars, upon which there were liens prior to the judgment of Field, Benedict & Co., to the amount of six hundred dollars. As to the value, the *539testimony is conflicting, but this was tbe sum fixed by the referee, and is substantially correct.
Plaintiff and defendant (Watson) reside in the same place, and within a few rods of each other. At the time of the redemption, plaintiff was not aware that Watson held the certificates of purchase; nor did he know…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hall v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- People ex rel. Collier v. Sheriff of BroomeNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- People ex rel. Post v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- People ex rel. Woolley v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Haskell v. ManloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyd v. OlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Hooker v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Fernandez Co. v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Indiana Bond Co. v. BruceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Buford v. HenzierU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.