Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Keisling v. Norblad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1993No. SC S40689PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*617GILLETTE, J.

The Secretary of State seeks a writ of mandamus directing dismissal of an action that challenges the authority of the Secretary of State to place Ballot Measure 1 on the ballot as a single measure in the November 9, 1993, special statewide election. Pursuant to this decision, a peremptory writ of mandamus shall issue immediately, granting the relief prayed for.

THE HISTORY OF BALLOT MEASURE 1 AND THIS PROCEEDING

On August 3, 1993, the legislature adopted House Joint Resolution 10 (HJR 10). HJR 10 proposes to amend the Oregon Constitution by adding new sections to it as follows:(1)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Fidanque v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Riesland v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Leo v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Meyer v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API