Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Bradbury

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2006No. CC 04C20669; CA A127935; SC S53693, SC S53840PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*291DE MUNIZ, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the Secretary of State from placing on the November 2006 general election ballot an initiative — Initiative Petition 8 (2006) (IP 8) — that would amend the Oregon Constitution to permit the state to regulate campaign contributions and expenditures. Plaintiffs asserted that, as proposed, the initiative contained two or more constitutional amendments that, under the separate-vote requirement set out in Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution, must be voted on separately.1 The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Straw v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. StonemanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hazell v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Multnomah County v. MehrweinOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Hazell v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API