Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fidanque v. Paulus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1984No. SC S31002PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*713CAMPBELL, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding over which this court took original jurisdiction pursuant to Article VII, (Amended), section 2, of the Oregon Constitution, and ORS 34.120. It relates to Ballot Measure Number 8 titled “Revises Numerous Criminal Laws Concerning Police Powers, Trials, Evidence, Sentencing.”

Plaintiff-Relators allege that the Secretary of State breached her constitutional duty by certifying a prospective petition and allocating to it a ballot number in violation of the single issue requirement of Article IV, section 1(2) (d) of the Oregon Constitution. This case raises…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holmes v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Buell v. Jefferson County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel Sajo v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Venn v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Kays v. McCallOregon Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Keisling v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Mathieu v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API