Jordan v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action to recover rent due and unpaid under a written lease of a certain storeroom in the city of Los Angeles. On December 1, 1911, plaintiff’s assignor, Marsh, leased the premises in question to defendant Scott for a term which,- as extended by a supplemental agreement in writing, expired January 31, 1915, and Scott entered into possession thereunder. November 30, 1912, Scott, by a written agreement which was in form and terms a sublease, but which plaintiff contends was in legal effect a pro tanto assignment,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Brosnan v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Baker v. Maier Zobelein BreweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Sullivan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Weddle v. HeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Berkeley Dev. Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Gilman v. NemetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.