Legal Opinion

Weddle v. Heath

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13382PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff by coming into contact with a rapidly moving endless belt running on revolving pulleys, a part of certain pumping machinery located on the lands of .defendant. Plaintiff had a verdict for $15,000, followed by judgment in said sum, from which defendant has appealed on a bill of exceptions.

The amended complaint is in six counts, all having for their basis the charge of negligence in that defendant failed to properly guard the said pumping machinery or, putting it in another form, that defendant failed to furnish a safe…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Garcia v. California Truck Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Brett v. S. H. Frank & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Skrbina v. Fleming Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Crow v. PEG Construction Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API