Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Nemetz

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1962No. Civ. 25572PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment for damages in favor of the plaintiff. The controversy arose out of a transaction in which the defendant sold a retail liquor business to the plaintiff and executed a sublease of business premises.

The evidence which gave support to the findings of fact of the trial court will be stated. On May 24, 1948, the defendant Nemetz and another leased from persons named Greenhagen premises which were described as lots 149, 150 and 151 and were located on Figueroa Street near Century Boulevard in Los Angeles. A store building was on lot 151. The other lots…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tavaglione v. BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Fisher v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Northridge Hospital Foundation v. Pic 'N' Save No. 9, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API