Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1958No. 37,270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal by the state from a judgment adjudging that the state has taken a perpetual flowage easement upon the intervening property *402owner’s land and awarding damages for such taking.1

This case, involving an omitted property owner in condemnation proceedings, has been before this court in two prior appeals.2 In 1935 the state commenced condemnation proceedings to acquire by the power of eminent domain certain lands in Chippewa County for the purpose of creating and perpetually maintaining a reservoir for the storage and maintenance of an adequate supply of water in Lac qui Parle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. State v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State v. Gannons Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API