Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1953No. 35,548PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment mandamusing the state to condemn certain lands. 2

In 1935 the state commenced condemnation proceedings to acquire by the power of eminent domain certain lands in Chippewa county for the purpose of creating and perpetually maintaining a reservoir for the storage and maintenance of an adequate supply of water in Lac qni Parle Lake and for the purpose of the regulation and control of floods. By the spring of 1937 the state had acquired title to the lands involved in its original proceedings and the building of dikes, dams,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by LuhrsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Minnesota Council of State Employees v. American Federation of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Schiltz v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Volden v. SelkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. State Bank of Rose Creek v. Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API