Legal Opinion

Oakley v. Rosen

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1946No. Civ. 15374PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

In a joint complaint appellants sued appellee for the sums of $2,400 and $1,200 alleged to be amounts paid by them respectively for 10 per cent and 5 per cent interest in the profits to be realized by appellee from a dramatic production contract with the authors dated September 24, 1942. By such contract appellee had undertaken to produce and present a play entitled “Harem Scarem.” It is also alleged that one Ben Blumenthal and one Israel Slavin were investors to the extent of 5 per cent and 30 per cent respectively in the “Harem Scarem” contract, and that both signed the same agreement with…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Goldberg v. ListCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,724 John D. Williamson, Cross-Appellees v. Gordon G. Tucker, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Kauffman v. KauffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API