Oakley v. Rosen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
In a joint complaint appellants sued appellee for the sums of $2,400 and $1,200 alleged to be amounts paid by them respectively for 10 per cent and 5 per cent interest in the profits to be realized by appellee from a dramatic production contract with the authors dated September 24, 1942. By such contract appellee had undertaken to produce and present a play entitled “Harem Scarem.” It is also alleged that one Ben Blumenthal and one Israel Slavin were investors to the extent of 5 per cent and 30 per cent respectively in the “Harem Scarem” contract, and that both signed the same agreement with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Goldberg v. ListCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,724 John D. Williamson, Cross-Appellees v. Gordon G. Tucker, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Kauffman v. KauffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.