Legal Opinion
Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1989No. S-2074, S-2127PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
This case addresses one aspect of drug testing by employers. A private employer, Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc. (Nabors), established a drug testing program for its employees. Two Nabors employees, Clarence Luedtke and Paul Luedtke, both of whom worked on drilling rigs on the North *1125Slope, refused to submit to urinalysis screening for drug use as required by Na-bors. As a result they were fired by Na-bors. The Luedtkes challenge their discharge on the following grounds:
1. Nabors’ drug testing program violates the Luedtkes’ right to privacy guaranteed by article I, section 22 of…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph Fenner, Florian Sever v. Alaska Pulp Corporation Dennis Huse George Woodbury Jesse Cline Frank Roppel George Ishiyama Wayne Funk Ralph FennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Tiernan v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.