Legal Opinion
Fry v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 2000No. 94,352PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLBERT, J.
T1 Claimant, John W. Fry, seeks this court's review of the workers' compensation trial court's order granting him benefits from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund (MITEF). The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that Claimant's benefits must be delayed. Upon review of the record and applicable law, we conclude that the trial court did not err and sustain its order.
12 Claimant filed a Form 3-F in the Workers' Compensation Court on May 26, 1999, seeking benefits from the MITF. Claimant injured both shoulders on May 9, 1997, and was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Clayton v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- McGough v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. PullumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Barnhill v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001