Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.
This ease involves one of the great jurisprudential debates of the twentieth century: 1 Whether an appellate court decision announcing a new rule of law, or changing an old one, should always be applied retroactively or may sometimes be applied only prospectively. We granted certiorari to revisit this question in light of the United States Supreme Court’s abandonment last year, in Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993), of the multi-factored analysis, for civil cases, in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.