Messer v. City of Dickinson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for damages against the city of Dickinson for maintaining a nuisance. The plaintiff is the owner of a building used as a second-class hotel. It is located on the south side of the city near the Heart River. The main sewer of the city empties into the Heart River at a point downstream approximately 600 feet east by north of plaintiff's building. The plaintiff is not a riparian owner. The Heart River is a non-navigable stream. The plaintiff claims that since December, 1932, offensive and nauseating odors, stenches, and gases have been generated by and because of the pollution…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- McLaughlin v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Riggs v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Eck v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Fargo v. SalsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Greer v. City of LennoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Flynn v. Hurley Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.