Legal Opinion

City of Fargo v. Salsman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2009No. 20080162PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert E. Salsman appeals from a judgment ordering him to immediately abate a nuisance on his property by removing and disposing of “all trash, rubbish, junk and junk automobiles” and permanently enjoining him from maintaining a nuisance on the property. We conclude the district court did not err in ruling the City of Fargo had the authority to bring this action and there was a nuisance on Salsman’s property, and Salsman’s statutory and constitutional rights were not violated by Fargo’s action. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Since 1976, Salsman has owned a 50-foot by 140-foot lot…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Schwab v. ZajacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kappenman v. KlipfelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Simons v. State, Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API