Legal Opinion
Nader v. McAuliffe
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0428 (RMU)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Terry McAuliffe, former Chairman of the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”), and Steven Raikin, Director, Treasurer and Secretary of a political organization called the Ballot Project. The plaintiffs— Ralph Nader, his former running mate Peter Camejo and six of their supporters — brought the instant suit and many others following Nader’s unsuccessful presidential bid in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Libertarian Party of Ohio v. Jon HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Trazell v. WilmersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jordan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.