Legal Opinion

Trazell v. Wilmers

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1369PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Delonte Emiliano Trazell, proceeding pro se, filed this case against defendants Manufactory and Traders Trust Bank (“MT & T”); Robert G. Wilmers, CEO and Director of MT & T; and Michael Trayder, in his capacity as an employee of MT & T (collectively “defendants”). In his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants repossessed his vehicle on June 19, 2012, in violation of:

• the Treaty of Watertown of 1776;

• the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution;

• 12 U.S.C. § 83;

• 15 U.S.C. § 1681S-2;

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bronner v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Slovinec v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Bronner v. DugganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Freeman v. Howard University College of MedicineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  5. Laureatus Group, LLC v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API