Legal Opinion

United States v. Woodall

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 2, 1971No. 23,812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

In this ease, as in United States v Bowman, 20 USCMA 119, 42 CMR 311 (1970), the military judge, in his attempt to comply with the requirements laid down by this Court in United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149 (1969), accepted from defense counsel a written form (Appellate Exhibit l),1 initialed and signed by the accused, which described the accused’s right to counsel as provided by Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 838. The judge ascertained from defense counsel that he had personally informed the accused in accordance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. BowmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. GoodinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. MosleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. WagnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WhitmireUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. CopesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. JerasiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. MeyerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API