United States v. Wagner
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*316Opinion of the Court
FeRguson, Judge:
In this case, the military judge, in his efforts to comply with the requirements laid down by this Court in United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149 (1969), asked defense counsel whether he had “explained to the accused his rights concerning counsel prior to entering the courtroom?” Upon receiving an affirmative reply, he requested counsel to state the nature of this advice. Thereafter, the military judge did not personally question the accused, as required by Donohew, relative to his knowledge of “each of the elements of Article 38(b), as well as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. PalosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. FortierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. BowmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CopesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. WoodallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971