Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Meyer

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 14, 1972No. 24,717PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn,Judge:

In separate specifications, the accused was charged with possession of mepro-bamate, a tranquilizer, in violation of Army Regulation 600-50, dated June 29, 1966 (Charge I, specification 1), possession of a tablet containing two barbiturates in violation of the same regulation (Charge I, specification 2), wrongful possession of marihuana (Charge II, specification 1), and wrongful possession of opium (Charge II, specification 2).' He pleaded guilty as charged.

Both before and at trial, the parties treated possession of the substances listed in the regulation as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. BurneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. ModesettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. HughesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. WashingtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. IrvingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. RushingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API