Legal Opinion

Tinaglia v. Ittzes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1977No. 11766PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

Plaintiffs seek a declaration that a road over defendants’ property is a dedicated public road or, in the alternative, that there exists, appurtenant to plaintiffs’ property, an easement of way for all purposes upon that road. Plaintiffs also pray for an injunction against defendants Ittzes and damages from all defendants. From a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint on its merits, plaintiffs have appealed. We reverse.

In the spring of 1972, the plaintiffs, J. Dean and Madonna L. Tinaglia, acquired some three thousand acres of land from defendants Alvin and Marion Katt.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mason v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ramstad v. CarrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. First Church of Christ v. RevellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cole v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Piechowski v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fassihi v. Sommers, Schwartz, Silver, Schwartz & Tyler, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Selway Homeowners Ass'n v. CummingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Knight v. MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Haley v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API