Ramstad v. Carr
North Dakota Supreme Court
From a judgment of the District Court of Ward County, Leighton, J. Defendants appeal. Where the owner plats land into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, and the plat thereof is duly executed, filed, and recorded, and all done as by the laws of this state provided, and where a portion of such land is marked and designated on the plat as a park; and whore such owner in thereafter selling the lots used such plat, made reference to the said park and to its location, and issued…
Read the full summary
From a judgment of the District Court of Ward County, Leighton, J. Defendants appeal. Where the owner plats land into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, and the plat thereof is duly executed, filed, and recorded, and all done as by the laws of this state provided, and where a portion of such land is marked and designated on the plat as a park; and whore such owner in thereafter selling the lots used such plat, made reference to the said park and to its location, and issued his deeds describing the lots sold as “according to the plat,” and where the proper public officials have assumed…
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
The question presented for our determination on this appeal is whether a certain tract of land situate within the corporate limits of the city of Minot is a public park, dedicated by the owners to the use of the public, and as such subject to, and under the control of, the board of park commissioners of that city; or the private property of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs prevailed in the courts below, and defendants. have appealed, and demanded a trial de novo in this court.
The land in question is a portion of a larger tract which the plaintiffs purchased in January, 1905, from one Sevald H.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Maynard v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- County of Wayne v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Church v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Putnam v. DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Frye v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Indian Rocks Beach South Shore v. EwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Priolo v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Tinaglia v. IttzesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.